Improving
traffic safety |
BRAD FOSS |
At times, they have promised $1 million to anyone who
presented them with a workable solution. But after more than 15 years,
employees of the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District, as
well as its 19-member board of directors, have come to learn that there are no
easy answers when it comes to preventing vehicle collisions on the
world-famous Golden Gate Bridge. It has also become apparent that if ever a
person does invent an effective barrier system for the bridge, the value of
that design is worth much more than a million dollars. In addition to the bridge’s six ten-foot-wide
lanes which feel even narrower when traveling at or above the 45
M.P.H. bridge speed limit-unpredictable weather conditions can make
transportation between Mann and San Francisco at times, treacherous. In 1995,
there were 80 vehicle accidents on the bridge, and in 1994 there were three
fatalities related to cars veering out of their lane. The most common technical hurdle for engineers
is to create a barrier that is strong enough to withstand the impact of a car
and yet thin enough so that it does not significantly reduce the bridge’s
overall lane widths. If any one of the lane widths were reduced further, the
likelihood of vehicles side-swiping one another would increase, bridge
officials say. The search continues.
“They’ve been working on it so long, they’ve got to be close,”
said Golden Gate Bridge Captain Ronald Garcia, who believes that as long as
people disobey the bridge speed limit, there will be fatalities.
“If somebody could up with a workable solution, I
really believe the district would do it. No matter what the cost. Well, maybe
not at any cost,” Garcia added. He said that about eight years ago the bridge
district publicized a $1 million) offering to any inventor who developed a
barrier that worked. |
The Retractable Delineator System would be
controlled by computers and air compressors. Guernsey believes that at six
inches wide the barriers would not be hazardous to the already narrow lanes.
Guernsey and a Fairfax resident are now trying to garner support from Mann
County residents to put an initiative on the November 1996 ballot that would
require the bridge district to take a harder look at barrier proposals because
they say “the current system of lane reversal cones to separate opposing lanes
of traffic on the bridge are inferior and have caused death… to persons
driving on the bridge.”
|
|
“It’s crazy,” said Dick Spotswood, a
former member of the bridge district’s board of directors. But, Spotswood
commended Guernsey for his efforts to forward further safety studies by way of
a countywide initiative. “Sooner or later something will be done about it,”
he added. About 135,O00 vehicles cross the Golden Gate Bridge every day, generating more than $150,000 in tolls, but with plans underway for a $175 million seismic retrofitting project and serious talk about a bridge sidewalk patrol to prevent suicides, a lane barrier is prioritized third on this list by many officials. Mainly because no one knows if a workable solution exists.
|
“First we have to come up with something that works
before we begin even considering the costs,” said Warren.
To any engineers with a system they think might work, Board President Bob
Mc Donnel says, ‘‘Show us what you’ve got.” |
(photo at right) Robert Guernsey unveiled his ‘Retractable Delineator System’ to
the local media corps and county officials last week. Guernsey believes hi~
design can prevent head-on collisions on the Golden Gate Bridge, which in the
past have resulted in fatalities. Photo by Privette |